From 85cb5bff255d986a4f9193c1f48722f47aecbf4b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Buetow Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 19:54:23 +0300 Subject: Update content for md --- gemfeed/2025-07-22-task-samurai.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'gemfeed/2025-07-22-task-samurai.md') diff --git a/gemfeed/2025-07-22-task-samurai.md b/gemfeed/2025-07-22-task-samurai.md index 83c29f63..21c526ce 100644 --- a/gemfeed/2025-07-22-task-samurai.md +++ b/gemfeed/2025-07-22-task-samurai.md @@ -101,8 +101,8 @@ Here's the million-dollar (or many hours saved) question: Did it buy me speed? Let's do some back-of-the-envelope math: -* Say each commit takes Codex 5 minutes to generate, and you need to review/guide 179 commits = about *6 hours of active development*. -* If you coded it all yourself, including all the bug fixes, features, design, and documentation, you might spend *10–20 hours*. +* Say each commit takes Codex 5 minutes to generate, and you need to review/guide 179 commits = about _6 hours of active development_. +* If you coded it all yourself, including all the bug fixes, features, design, and documentation, you might spend _10–20 hours_. * That's a couple of days potential savings. ## Conclusion -- cgit v1.2.3